Mittwoch, 24. Dezember 2014

THE HOBBIT: BATTLE OF THE FIVE ARMIES - Movie Review

 Title: The Hobbit: Battle of the Five Armies
Running Time: 144 min
Director: Peter Jackson
Starring: Martin Freeman, Ian McKellen, Richard Armitage, Luke Evans, Lee Pace, Orlando Bloom, Evangeline Lilly, Aidan Turner,Cate Blanchett, Hugo Weaving, Christopher Lee, Ian Holm, Stephen Fry, Ken Scott

Review:
What "Star Wars" was to the 70's and 80's, "The Lord of the Rings" was to the 2000's: An instant world-wide pop culture phenomenon that spawned hundreds of millions of fans that rewatch the films over and over again and whose knowledge about the saga even goes beyond the movieverse. Yes, Peter Jackson put a book into film that was considered unfilmable for a long time, and when we look at the result, we can be happy The Beatles didn't succeed in making their planned adaptation with Paul as Frodo, Ringo as Sam, George as Gandalf, and John Lennon as Gollum.* Who knows what would have happened to "The Hobbit" then, the story that Jackson brought into cinemas 9 years after "The Return of the King". And a story whose epic conclusion is out in cinemas right now.
"The Hobbit: The Battle of the Five Armies" is a great and worthy finale for this prequel trilogy. Obviously, the stakes aren't as high as in the "Rings movies", but looking at "The Hobbit" on its own, this third film really captures the tone of the franchise while still going darker. At the end of last year, we were left with a fire-breathing cliffhanger and as a result we get thrown right into the action this time. A lot of stuff happens at the beginning. Stuff that we probably thought would make up more of the whole film's story, and after a few calmer moments the movie comes right back with the event giving it its title. If the first film was all introduction, and the second part all storyline, then this film is all action. It is basically this one epic battle, but now that we have gotten to know all these characters, we have people to care about on multiple sides.
Martin Freeman has nailed his portrayal of Bilbo once more and especially at the end of the movie, gets to show that off. Richard Armitage does great as well, although his characters' development felt a little bit rushed.
Eventhough not all the drama of the film works, a lot of the emotional moments at the end really hit you, and Jackson also manages to tie the film nicely to the beginning of "The Lord of The Rings", which brings back some nostalgia as well. Fundamentalistic book-lovers will, however, be disappointed, since there are quite a few changes made. Personally, I didn't mind them, as I felt they did not hurt the overall atmosphere. All in all, "The Battle of the Five Armies" puts a great last piece into the Middle-earth saga, that is very fitting with its two predecessors. So if you liked those, you will definetely get your money's worth.
Now, we have an epic fantasy hexalogy on our hands!

For Fans Of:
The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey (2012)
The Hobbit: Desolation of Smaug (2013)
The Lord of The Rings Trilogy (2001-2003)


And check out my friend's review over at B.A.'s Screentest for a second opinion!

*true story

Sonntag, 21. Dezember 2014

TOP 5 UNCONVENTIONAL CHRISTMAS MOVIES - Holiday Special

Hello there puny humans,
'tis just a few days till Christmas and just in case you are sick and tired of the old reruns of all the classic Christmas films like Home Alone, Christmas Vacation and The Santa Clause, then you might want to consider my "Top 5 Unconventional Christmas Movies". These films are all set on the holiday in question, but don't necessarily capture its spirit the way you'd expect. So enjoy the list, and maybe you will find yourself a whole new favourite Christmas film :


5. KISS KISS BANG BANG (2005)
 "Its hard to believe it was just last Christmas that Harmony and I changed the world." This is the first line of the film's narrator, and eventhough you don't get that big of a Christmas vibe due to its sunny Californian setting (with the exception of Michelle Monaghan in a Santa dress), Kiss Kiss Bang Bang makes the list. Why? Because it's just so damn good. One of the best crime-comedies of all time. Clever, ridiculously funny, and unpredictable, this film starring Robert Downey Jr. and Val Kilmer is a must-see the whole year round. But why not watch it in the season the story takes place in?


4. IRON MAN 3 (2013)
I almost wanted to disqualify this Marvel blockbuster, because of its many similarities to the flick listed above. It too is directed by Shane Black, and also stars Downey Junior once more as an unreliable narrator. However, this December set superhero story has a lot of ideas to show off on its own. I mean, Tony Stark turns Christmas tree balls into grenades. The winter holidays hardly get more bad-ass than this. And who could forget the giant bunny? So, despite its controversial take on the "Mandarin", this flick from the MCU has everything a Christmas movie needs: Snow, Fun and Explosions!


3. BATMAN RETURNS (1992)
The second comic book movie on the list, but this time it is DC. Tim Burton's wonderful take on the caped crusader, doesn't only manage the difficult task of handling multiple villains, but also gives us a nice Christmas setting. The paradox of seeing those innocent holidays being celebrated in a rotten town like Gotham is entertaining on its own. But the Dark Knight fighting in white snow, as well as the Penguin's henchmen jumping out of giant presents, is a whole 'nother level of awesome. All of it mixed with the iconic performances of Pfeiffer, DeVito and Keaton, makes this pioneer of superhero films a terrific movie to watch this winter!


 2. DIE HARD (1988)
Did I say earlier that the holiday season doesn't get more bad- ass than exploding Christmas tree balls? Well, how about you go to the Christmas party of your estranged wife's work-place, which is held on the 30th floor of an otherwise empty building, and suddenly a bunch of terrorist take all the guests hostage, and you (being the only one left) have to fight your way through all of them. One at a time. Alone. With no shoes on...
That's John McClane's Christmas story for ya! Maybe the greatest action movie ever made, and yet it still somehow manages to get a message about trust and the importance of family across.


1. GREMLINS (1984)
This film earns its number one spot on this list, because it is so traditional and at the same time, it so isn't. All the old Christmas movies seem to follow a similar pattern: The family just starts the Christmas preperations, when something goes wrong. Either you accidently left a child back home, or you were foolish enough to leave Clark Grisworld in charge, but no movie takes it as far as Spielberg, Columbus and Dante did, with their 1984 monster adventure. Silent night? More like violent night! Starting off with the classic snowy eighties small town, and a wacky but likable father who buys a special present for his son, all hell suddenly breaks lose when the vicious little Gremlins rise up and create more than a little chaos: An old lady gets thrown out of a window, a school teacher is eaten alive, and when the humans fight back, you don't only see the evil-doers getting turned to sludge by a blender, but also exploding in microwaves. An immense amount of brutal fun for the whole family. Gremlins truely is - a Christmasterpiece!


So these are my alternatives to watch during the holiday season! If you feel like I've missed some movies, just stayed tuned and wait for the end of 2015, when I will reveal my "Another Top 5 Unconventional Christmas Movies" list. But of course not before you've checked out all of my suggestions on this one. All that's left for me to do now is to wish all of my lovely readers a very merry Christmas!

Your Cinemartian

Dienstag, 9. Dezember 2014

OUTSIDE HOLLYWOOD EP.7 - Marketing, Trailers, Suicide Squad and more...

 Hello there puny humans,
it's Episode VII of our movie podcast and my buddy from B.A.'s Screentest  and I got so excited about that, that we've kinda stretched ou usual length of 30 minutes per part. In the first of these two, we are talking about trailers: What makes a good trailer? How should or shouldn't a film be marketed? What did we think of the Jurrassic World, Terminator, and Star Wars Trailers? All in an interesting 40 minutes:

In the second part we talk in depth about the "Suicide Squad" casting news, as well as our recent reviews and films you should watch:

Hopefully you will find this episode interesting and have as much fun as we do. To me, the part where Björn leaves the room was a new experience for me.

Your Cinemartian

Sonntag, 7. Dezember 2014

HORRIBLE BOSSES 2 - Movie Review

Title: Horrible Bosses 2
Running Time: 108 min
Director: Sean Anders
Starring: Jason Bateman, Jason Sudekis, Charlie Day, Chris Pine, Christoph Waltz, Jamie Foxx, Jennifer Aniston, Jonathan Banks

Review:
If a comedy gets a sequel, it was usually very successful. However, it always seems like hit-or-miss with these follow-up films. "The Hangover Trilogy" for example decreased in quality with every installment, while "22 Jump Street" managed to deliver the same way the first one did. So now, the trio involving Bateman, Day and Sudekis is up with their second film, and the hopes of satisfiying audiences once more.
Overall, "Horrible Bosses 2" does what it is supposed to do: It makes you laugh. Just like in the first film, the three main actors are the heart of the story. Their great chemistry leaves you with the impression that they had lots of fun on set, and it really transfers to the audiences. The movie also offers a nice mix of situational comedy, physical comedy, improvisation and some jokes that are simply a matter of how a scene is framed, which makes for some hilarious moments. Next to all that, the references to pop culture and the first movie (including the return of Kevin Spacey, Jennifer Aniston and Jamie Foxx) are a treat as well. In general, you have to give the film credit for its ambition, as it has some stylish transition at points, and tries to make its plot stay unpredictable.
But the movie has some weak points too: As often the case with comedy sequels, the characters become more exaggerated versions of themselves, so much so, that they are almost one-note. Further, the raunchy humor goes a little bit over the top sometimes, especially when Aniston is on screen.
So is "Horrible Bosses 2" as good as the first one? Not quite. Does it revolutionize the comedy genre? Nope. Is it a flawless film? Also no. But I felt entertained nonetheless and had a great time watching it. Therefore, if you just want to have a fun night out, this is the right film to watch!

For Fans Of:
Horrible Bosses (2011)
This Is the End (2013)
We're the Millers (2013)

Click Here To Watch Trailer! 

Donnerstag, 27. November 2014

THE HUNGER GAMES: MOCKINGJAY - PART 1 - Movie Review

Title: The Huger Games: Mockingjay - Part 1
Running Time: 123 min
Director: Francis Lawrence
Starring: Jennifer Lawrence, Josh Hutcherson, Liam Hemsworth, Woody Harrelson, Julianne Moore, Elizabeth Banks, Sam Claflin, Jeffrey Wright, Philip Seymour Hoffman (†), Donald Sutherland, Natalie Dormer, Sarita Choudhury, Stanley Tucci, Willow Shields

Review:
Jennifer Lawrence has made a meteoric rise in just four years. Landing the role of Mystique in the popular "X-Men" franchise, as well as the lead role in the film adaptation of the young adult novel "The Hunger Games", she quickly became one of Hollywood's darlings and, because of her down-to-earth attitude, managed to get an enourmos fan-base. Critics seem to like her too, as she has been nominated for an Academy Award three times since 2010 and even won the Oscar Gold for Best Supporting Actress in 2013. So, with "The Hunger Games: Mockingjay - Part 1" Lawrence returns to the franchise that made her a worldwide phenomenon once more.
The emphasis in this title is really placed on the term "Part 1". The film builds up a lot of tension, but misses a climax, and thus, feels more like a bridge to "Mockingjay Part 2". Storywise, you get the impression that the "Hunger Games" franchise has matured, as its political themes are increasingly coming to the fore, which is cool to see. Focussing heavily on the way two opposing groups use propaganda in order to get people to join their cause, it is an interesting and relevant piece. As result, however, they cut back on the action, so if you are just in for the people-murdering-each-other aspect, you will be disappointed.
The actors all deliver extremely well. Josh Hutcherson manages to level up his performance, especially in the final act of the film, and the script allows Jennifer Lawrence to show a bit more range the other movies did. Dormer and Moore are great additions, and very fitting for their roles, as well as the late Phillip Seymour Hoffman who gets as close to comic relief as you can in a dystopian story.
Visually, the film's effect have improved as well, while the color palette is much less flashy than in "Catching Fire" to fit the overall tone. In general, the movie looks much smaller than its predecessors, since it has just a few settings and is slower paced. Nonetheless, because the characters (and with them the audience) are looking at the bigger picture, you can't help but feel that you are at the brink of something monumental.
In the end, although it could be argued wether it was good to split the third entry in two movies, "The Hunger Games: Mockingjay - Part 1" is a worthy entry for the series. If you are a fan of the franchise, and maybe even read the books, it won't let you down. If, on the other hand, you are just a casual viewer, it won't be too bad if you catch it some time next year just before the finale comes out. Having read the books I can say: It is going to be of epic proportion!


For Fans Of:
The Hunger Games: Catching Fire (2013)
The Hunger Games (2012)

Click Here To Watch Trailer!

Dienstag, 25. November 2014

OUTSIDE HOLLYWOOD EP.6 - TV Shows, Nightcrawler, and more

 Hello there puny humans,
another fortnight has passed, so that means another Podcast is out! This time my buddy Björn from B.A.'s Screentest and I decided to talk about TV. Why do we have this "golden age of television"? What are some good shows? Which ones do we personally like?

Again we split this into two parts and in this one we give our thoughts on "Nightcrawler", as well as special casting news for Bond 24 and Captain America: Civil War and much more!

I hope you'll enjoy it and maybe start to watch some series that you might not have heard of before!

Your Cinemartian

Samstag, 22. November 2014

TRANSFORMERS vs. PACIFIC RIM - why they are NOT the same!

 Hello there puny humans,
today I want to talk to you about something that has been bugging me for quite some time. When I watched Pacific Rim I had an amazing time and it became one of my favourite films. Nevertheless, I understand that this is a movie that is targeted to a specific audience, so not everyone might enjoy it the way I did. What I can't accept, however, is the phrase: "Well, it's just the same shit as Transformers".
It isn't. Sure, it has giant robots/aliens fighting each other, but that is as big of a similarity as the one between the Spielberg-classic Jaws and the god-awful Shark Attack-franchise. So let me enlighten you with the following article, where I will examine a few elements of these films and highlight their differences:


1. The Right Direction
Granted, this is not the best argument, as almost every director has hits and misses, but just look at the filmmakers who conceived these projects: In one corner, there is Guillermo del Toro. A man, whom you will most likely associate with the dark fantasy drama Pan's Labyrinth, which was nominated for 6 Oscars and won 3. During his career del Toro himself has earned a total of 27 different film awards and has also published three novels that then spawned comic books and a TV series.
In the other corner is Michael Bay. A nine-time Golden Raspberry Nominee, who actually won the infamous award twice: Worst Director and Worst Film, both in 2009. Further, this guy's directing style has gotten its own nickname in Hollywood, "Bayhem", which is obviously a wordplay on  "mayhem", a term that literally means chaos or confusion. I mean, we are talking about the person that wanted to turn the Ninja Turtles into aliens...

2. Less Is More
Of course, these films are not intellectual cinema. They simply want to entertain in a spectacular fashion. Pacific Rim understands that. Sure, the whole two-pilots-for-a-jaeger thing was a tiny bit complicated, but otherwise the story is very simple and straightforward: Huge Aliens attack our cities, so we fight back with huge robots. There isn't much more to it. But exactly that is perfect, because we don't need more.
The Transformers movies on the other hand shoehorne too many unnecessary subplots and too much mythological non-sense into their story-line. With all that overflow, you'll need a few seconds to realize that at the end of the first movie, they defeat the bad guy by giving him "the cube", so the thing they tried to hide from him during the entire rest of the film. Ultimately, this means that if our "heroes" hadn't been there to "help", a whole city would have been saved from destruction... awesome! -_-
I won't even start to rant about the second film, which was such a clusterfuck that even its director admitted it in an interview with the Empire: "The real fault with [Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen] is that it ran into a mystical world. When I look back at it, that was crap."

3. Shooting Action - or: "What the fuck is happening?"
Now, as previously stated, the action is the one big thing both of these films really are about. But here too, the movies have little in common. I talked about Bayhem before and I am going to explain it further:
Action Scene from Transformers 2
 Michael Bay tries to make his shots as epic as possible, which is a commendable plan, but as always he goes too far over the top. Most of the time, his action sequences have multiple layers to achieve depth, and at least two of those layers contain objects that move in different directions to make the shot more dynamic. Additionally, the camera usually moves yet another way. If used correctly, this kind of technique can look awesome, as seen in the amazing tracking shot in The Avengers. Bay, however, does a few mistakes: Firstly, the different movements happen way too fast and often he edits his scenes with quick cuts. This makes the picture very agitated and restless. Secondly, he uses this style almost exclusively instead of highlighting certain events. As a result, it either becomes less special or even exhausting for the audience's eyes. On top of all that, Bay throws tons of explosions and flying debris in the mix, creating images that are extremly overcrowded, and especially when you are working with robots, it gets hard to tell where top or bottom is. If you want to find out more about Michael Bays convoluted style of directing I recommend Tony Zhou's youtube video on the matter.
Action Scene from Pacific Rim
Now, Pacific Rim on the other hand has a much more calm and epileptic-friendly way of creating awe-inspiring pictures. Instead of cramming a large number of things in the frame to demonstrate their variation in size, del Toro makes his creatures look big by using three certain techniques: The first one (and to be fair, Bay does this too) is using very low camera angles. By making the audience look far up at his creatures, they immediately appear to be humongous. Moreover, this effect is also achieved by showing only parts of their bodies in the frame, implying that they are simply to huge to be filmed in a full body shot, and leaving their actual size to the imagination of the viewer. Lastly, del Toro chooses the perfect settings for these fights. For example, knowing that the battle you are witnessing takes place in an ocean, but simultaneously seeing that the water is only knee-deep for these robots is, in all its simplicity, extremely powerful.

4. The Pieces of the Puzzle
 Now, we've checked "action" and "plot" off the list, and I admit that these might be the most crucial elements to determine the quality of this kind of film. Nonetheless, I am convinced there are a lot of other little things that can define a movie. So, I'll use this abstract to mention some of those:
The aliens in Pacific Rim are called "Kaijūs", which is japanese for giant monster, but the kaijū-film is even its own genre with Godzilla as its most famous representative. Guillermo del Toro pays great homage to that. For instance, his Kaijūs' acid spit is clearly inspired by Godzilla's famous atomic breath. The only thing Michael Bay pays tribute to is either himself (by shamelessly re-using footage of his older films) or commercial brands. But he doesn't only stuff his movies with a ridiculous amount of product placement. On average, the fourth Transformers film has an American flag on screen every three and a half minutes, and of course our friends from the U.S. Army are never far either. Pacific Rim is free of such an over-patriotism. In fact, its storyline has the whole world teaming up, with the biggest players next to the U.S. being Japan, Russia and Australia. Further, the commanding officer is British, and the scientists are German. Admittedly, the movie does stereotype these nations to an extent (think of the Russian's stone-cold faces), but at least it doesn't go full-on racist like Bay, who makes the only two dumb illiterate robots speak with a mexican accent.
If we talk about racism, we have to address sexism as well. It is very easy to see that Bay chooses his "actresses" based on looks rather than talent. Don't get me wrong, I enjoy seeing attractive women as much as the next guy, but I see no reason why female characters can't be beautiful and relevant to the story at the same time. Just recently, Edge of Tomorrow had exactly that in Emily Blunt's Rita Vrataski, the most beautiful of bad-asses. But Pacific Rim has some tough chicks of its own, with the fearless russian and, of course, the highly skilled Mako Mori. They might be the only two female roles in the film, but in this particular movie feud I will count the absence of a negative (like Bay constantly writing strippers into his scripts) as a positve.

5. Listen to Others
If I really haven't convinced you yet, maybe some solid statistics are due: The website Rotten Tomatoes collects online reviews from writers who are certified members of various writing guilds or film critic associations. On this site, Pacific Rim scored a 72% rating, while the Transformers films are at an average of 32.5% (the highest score being 57% for the first one, and the lowest score for the second part with an 18%).

6. Conclusion
At this point, you might have noticed that I am not too fond of the Transformers movies and the director behind them. It's true that I could easily go on talking about the qualities of the actors or the time and effort put into sequels, but in the end I only want you to take away this:
In times like these, where it seems like a new blockbuster is produced every day, we shouldn't forget what good and what bad film making is. Aside from our personal preference of a specific topic, we must judge a movie by looking at what it is trying to be, and wether it used skill or cheap tricks to achieve that. As we are showered with countless films, it is tempting to categorize very broadly, but often that doesn't do a movie justice. Because even seemingly mindless films about giant ass-kicking robots can be very different in quality!

I hope you guys enjoyed this article and had as much fun reading it as I had writing it. For those who want to know more fun or interesting stuff about the two films, I've put together a TRANSFORMERS vs. PACIFIC RIM playlist on youtube. Let me know if you want me to do more articles like this and what your own thoughts about those movies are. So feel free to comment below!

Sincerely,
Your Cinemartian!

"I am first and foremost a movie geek." - del Toro
"I am, like, a true American!" - Bay


Sonntag, 16. November 2014

NIGHTCRAWLER - Movie Review

Title: Nightcrawler
Running Time: 117 min
Director: Dan Gilroy
Starring: Jake Gyllenhaal, Rene Russo, Riz Ahmed, Bill Paxton

Review:
When Tobey Maguire injured his back just before filming "Spiderman 2", they had already tailored a spidey-suit to Jake Gyllenhaal, just before Maguire surprisingly recovered. Two years later, Gyllenhaal auditioned for the title role in "Superman Returns", but was turned down as the studio wanted an 'unknown face'. Being Batman didn't work out either, and the part went to Christian Bale. However, after memorable performances in critically acclaimed films like "Brokeback Mountain", "Zodiac" and most recently "End of Watch", "Prisoners" and "Enemy", you could argue that, albeit he never got to be a super-hero, he has turned into a super-actor. And "Nightcrawler" is a perfect example for that!
Following the character of Lou Bloom, we witness how he starts a business in a shady but not uncommon area of journalism: independent filmcrews trying to be the first ones at crime scenes to film the events and sell the footage to news stations. A job that Lou gets disturbingly good at.
Gyllenhaal gives an exceptional performance here, and completely disappears into the role of this success-seeking sociopath (try saying that three times in a row). Since he appears in every single scene, the whole film really relies on his acting chops, but he delivers perfectly. From the first minute on you realize that there is something off with this guy, and the fact that the writers didn't give him any kind of backstory makes this character seem so much more unpredictable. But the movie doesn't only present a despicable human being to us, it also shows how such a person can still find success in today's perverted media.
A lot of the film takes place on the streets and in cars, and after „Drive“ the city of Los Angeles proves once more that it is the perfect setting for such a movie. Paired with the beautiful direction of Dan Gilroy,  it creates a special kind of atmosphere, and in general, Gilroy surprises with this debut. Through the camera, he manages to put you in a character's shoes, but keeps it so subtle that you won't even notice it.
Overall, "Nightcrawler" is a compelling thriller that is worth watching for Gyllenhaal alone. As its characters cross lines and subvert morality, you will be creeped out and fascinated at the same time.

For Fans Of:
Taxi Driver (1976)
Drive (2011)
The Social Network (2010)
Falling Down (1993)

Click Here To Watch Trailer!

And check out my friend's review over at B.A.'s Screentest for a second opinion!

Mittwoch, 12. November 2014

OUTSIDE HOLLYWOOD EP.5 - Marvel vs. DC, Interstellar, etc.

 Hello there puny humans,
my friend from B.A.'s Screentest and I have recorded another podcast, and this time we changed up the format a bit. Now we have two thirty-minute parts with different topics: The first one is our big discussion about the movie battle between the comic book companies Marvel and DC. Who has the upper hand? Which of these upcoming superhero-movies are we excited for?



The second part is the review part, where we talk about the movies we watched recently (including "The Judge", "No Good Deed",  and of course "Interstellar"!), movies we recommend watching and the most recent movie news (Star Wars!!). So listen here:


Hopefully, you will have some good fun with these audible segments of our blogs and we will keep you interested!

Your Cinemartian 

Montag, 10. November 2014

INTERSTELLAR - Movie Review

 Title: Interstellar
Running Time: 169 min
Director: Christopher Nolan
Starring: Matthew McConaughey, Anne Hathaway, Sir Michael Caine, Jessica Chastain, Mackenzie Foy, Wes Bentley, David Gyasi, John Lithgow, Casey Affleck, Topher Grace

Review:
When "The Dark Knight Rises" is the worst movie you've ever made, you are pretty god damn good. Yes, even outside of his game-changing Batman Trilogy, Christopher Nolan gave us brilliantly twisted and intelligent films like "Memento", "The Prestige" and of course the modern day masterpiece "Inception". By now, you have probably noticed that he is my personal favourite when it comes to film-makers. Thus, I was waiting for his new original project "Interstellar" like a child for Christmas, and now, it is finally here. So did he manage to blow my mind again?
Yes. Yes he did. Big time! Leaving me speechless for the whole ride home from the theatre, "Interstellar" wasn't a movie to me, it was an experience. It is a true science-fiction film, that revolves around a man, who leaves his family and the dying earth behind, to find a new inhabitable planet in a different galaxy. Nolan, knowing exactly when less is more and when more is more, astonishes us with breathtaking visuals and manages to make you feel like you are actually part of this amazing space adventure.
But not only the director is fantastic: While all of the actors are doing a great job, leading man Matthew McConaughey is outstanding. Proving that he really did deserve the Academy Award, he can move you to tears merely with his facial expressions. The relationship between his character and that character's daughter (portrayed by a suprisingly talented Mackenzie Foy) is the emotional core of this film and brings the humanity to this intergalactic story.
It should be mentioned, however, that a lot of elements I loved, might not be everyone's cup of tea. With their script, Chris Nolan and his brother Jonathan go full theoretical astrophysics on you. Including wormholes, blackholes, the relativity of time and even the fourth dimension in their story, they try to make you grasp the incomprehensible. So even though acclaimed physicist Kip Thorne wasn't only an advisor, but even executive producer on the film, these element that are based on real science might come across as far-fetched for the lesser versed viewer. Especially towards the end it seems like Christopher Nolan put everything his imagination had to offer in this film, with some philosophical questions in the mix as well. So what I found to be pure brilliance, might seem convoluted to others.
Still, "Interstellar" might be the greatest science-fiction movie I have ever laid my eyes upon. It is an incredible piece of art and will take you on an unforgettable ride. A film everyone should watch, for so many reasons, but also simply because its themes and contents can start a great discussion. So all that's left for me to say is: Buy your ticket now!


For Fans Of:
2001: A Space Odyssey (1968)
Apollo 13 (1995)
Moon (2009)
Gravity (2013)
 
Click Here To Watch Trailer!

And check out my friend's review over at B.A.'s Screentest for a second opinion! 

Mittwoch, 5. November 2014

THANK YOU FOR 2,000 HITS!!!

 Hello there puny humans,
or rather AMAZING humans! About a week ago, this blog has reached two-thousand pageviews, which in my opinion definetly needs some celebration. Hitting that mark after only 198 days means that there is an average of ten people that visit this website daily, which is really much more than I would have imagined. Like lots of my projects, this started as a fun little experiment, and seeing that it is so well received is a fantastic feeling!
Granted, some clicks come from myself as I spell-check and make sure everything new works properly, and there also is some weird russian server I got fifty visitors from... it looks kinda dubious. However, every now and then people tell me things like "Yeah, I always read your blog." or "That was a good film, I'd be interested to read your opinion on it." which means a whole lot to me. Knowing that people value my opinion, makes me feel valued as person, and writing these reviews has now become part of my everyday life.
It's tons of fun to watch movies, and since I run this blog I haven't only been going to the theaters more often, but I've been looking at the films more closely. Exploring a film in such a depth, helps me learn more about filmmaking itself as I try to find out why exactly I liked or disliked something. This is awesome and enhances every movie going experience.
So thank you for all your support and for giving me the chance to do this! You are the best! So here's a tiny little something I made for you:



Further, I wanna put some new things on this site: Currently I am working on a "Fun Stuff" and a "T-Shows" segment and I might write a few articles other than reviews. Hopefully you keep being interested, so I can keep talking about movies! So let's see what the next 2,000 views will bring...

With Graditude,
Your Cinemartian!

Sonntag, 2. November 2014

THE JUDGE - Movie Review

Title: The Judge
Running Time: 141 min
Director: David Dobkin
Satrring: Robert Downey Jr., Robert Duvall, Vera Farmiga, Billy Bob Thornton, Vincent D'Onofrio, Dax Shepard

Review:
When you think of Robert Downey Jr., you think of Iron Man. No wonder since he has slipped into that role four times during the past six years. But even though he has become a world-wide action hero, Downey junior is no stranger to drama. Next to works like "Restoration" or "The Soloist", he even earned an Oscar nomination for his portrayal of Charlie Chaplin in the 1992 biopic. So him starring in a drama about a cocky defense attorney, who must help his estranged father (the eponymous judge) as he gets in trouble with the law himself is not that suprising. What is suprising however, is that such a film is directed by a guy who is best known for helming movies like "Wedding Crashers", "Shanghai Knights" and the mediocre "The Change-Up".
"The Judge", however, works. It isn't just a story about father-son relationships, but about family in general, how you deal with your past and, in this regard, what you want for your future. But there is humor spread across this movie too, giving it a nice balance between light and sad moments. Duvall and Downey junior are excellent in their roles. With quite a few powerful scenes together, they really are the heart and soul of this film. Yet, the rest of the cast doesn't stand in their shadow as everyone does a great job.
Critics have accused this film of being clichéd, and it is true that it includes quite a lot of the typical drama elements. The problems seems like a bit too many to happen to one family, but because the characters are so well realized and fleshed out, they are still very relatable. This identification with its themes and topics is probably the movies biggest strength, and also the reason that you might notice its overlength but won't mind it. In addition, the courtroom scenes (although there are fewer than you'd expect from a film called "The Judge") always add to the films tension and manage to keep you invested.
All in all, it is a movie that tries hard, but also succeeds doing so. Full of funny and sad moments, it might make you reflect on your own life a bit, and ultimately leave you with a good feeling!

For Fans Of:
Up in the Air (2009)
The Place Beyond the Pines (2012)

Click Here To Watch Trailer!

Samstag, 25. Oktober 2014

THE EQUALIZER - Movie Review

 Title: The Equalizer
Running Time: 132 min
Director: Antoine Fuqua
Starring: Denzel Washington, Martin Czokas, Chloë Grace Moretz, Johnny Skourtis, David Harbour

Review:
With "Taken" Liam Neeson found a new niche in Hollywood: Old men kicking a ton of ass. Since then, more and more movies have been trying their luck with this concept and eventhough Denzel Washington had already been kicking butts before his hair got grey, "The Equalizer" can probably be considered one of those attempts. And it worked out pretty damn well!
This film is a terrific action piece that really gives you goosebums in its most brutal moments. Revolving around a guy with a shady past, forced out of 'retirement' to go kill some bad guys, it actually seems like a pretty straight forward story. However, it is elevated by the great performances of its actors. Of course we've got our leading man, Denzel Washington, who shows us time and again that he is a true movie star. While the depiction of his character's good and warm side is mostly found within this dialogues, the darkness that lies underneath is almost exclusively presented through Washingtons body language and facial expression. Here, he puts a lot in the details and gives a perfekt example of how much one can say with very little. Opposing him is Martin Czokas, giving a performance that might as well be an audition for a Bond villain. Calm, but unpredictale, he brings tension to every scene he is in. The interaction between those two is very fun to watch, because dispite their differences, they are actually quite similar in their way of doing things. Chloe Grace Moretz' part is smaller than the trailers suggested, but she too does a very good job, assuring us that her career isn't doomed just because she started as a child actress.
Furthermore, the camera work needs to be mentioned here as well. The varied choices of angles and especially movement beautifully underline the characters' positions and inner processes, be it the total control of the situation or a feeling of restlessness. But since this is an action flick, let's come to the actual action,... which is awesome! Nicely choreographed and again cleverly filmed, it has a realism to its brutality that gives you the chills. There are some elements that you have seen before, but even those are executed well enough that you won't mind at all.
Sure, this movie is not flawless as it has a couple of scenes that don't really add to the story and could have easily been cut. Also there are one or two conveniences that feel like their sole purpose is to keep the plot moving and interesting. But "The Equalizer" is an extremely entertaining action film nonetheless, and the movie for you, if you want to see a super bad ass Denzel Washington one man show!


For Fans Of:
Man On Fire (2004)
Killer Elite (2011)
Safe House (2012)
Taken (2008)

Dienstag, 7. Oktober 2014

GONE GIRL - Movie Review

 Title: Gone Girl
Running Time: 149 min
Director: David Fincher
Starring: Ben Affleck, Rosamund Pike, Carrie Coon, Tyler Perry, Neil Patrick Harris, Kim Dickens

Review:
David Fincher is one of the greatest directors of our time. Gaining popularity with dark thrillers like "Se7en" and the cult hit "Fight Club", he later even managed to enthrall us with Dramas such as "The Curious Case of Benjamin Button" and "The Social Network", both of which, though lighter in tone, had the same emotional impact as their predecessors. Most recently, he also headed for the small screen producing and at times directing the incredible political series "House Of Cards". So is it save to say that he won't disappoint this time either? Hell yeah!
"Gone Girl" is a fantastic movie! Despite its two-and-a-half hour running time, it constantly keeps you on the edge of your seat, giving you enough twists and turns to have you wanting to know what happens next at any moment. Fincher achieves this with an excellent atmosphere and has you being empathetic, skeptical, curious, but most of them all: extremely creeped out! Yet, the film has much more going on for it than the mystery of a missing women. Critically examining topics like the influence of the media as well as the concept of marriage, it touches you on many different levels.
Another strike of genius is the cast. Everyone involved in this movie is giving an exceeding performance. Ben Affleck is the perfect choice for Nick Dunne, most likely channeling his own bad experiences with the public for his portrayal. Quite often, he shares the screen with Carrie Coon, who delivers such fine acting that you wonder why we haven't seen much of her until now. Also surprisingly convincing in their against-type roles are Neil Patrick Harris and even more so Tyler Perry, who delivers the few natural laughs of this film. The most captivating performance however, was given by Rosamund Pike, who has never been better. Through the many flashbacks in the movie, we learn  more and more about the relationship of our two protagonist, and with every bit we get more unsure of what is really going on.
The only "problem" with this movie is that the climax comes a tiny bit too early and eventhough the tension doesn't drop to zero (it acually never does in this film), ending the film a few scenes earlier wouldn't have hurt its overall feeling.
Still, "Gone Girl" is a brilliant multi-layered thriller that manages to put a packed movie theater under its spell. It catches you off guard and is definitely one of the greatest movies this year. A must-see! 

For Fans Of:
Zodiac (2007)
The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo (2009/2011)
Black Swan (2010)
We Need To Talk about Kevin (2011)

Click Here To Watch Trailer!

And check out my friend's review over at B.A.'s Screentest for a second opinion! 

Samstag, 4. Oktober 2014

NORTHMEN - Movie Review

Title: Northmen - A Viking Saga
Running Time: 97 min
Director: Claudio Fäh
Starring:  Tom Hopper, Ryan Kwanten, Charlie Murphey, Ed Skrein, Anatole Taubman, Ken Duken, Darrel D'Silva, James Norton, Johan Hegg

Review:
It's not every day, that Switzerland, Germany and Southafrica team-up to make an English language film about Vikings, which is including a british rapper and the lead singer of a swedish death-metal band in its cast. Therefore, no one quite knew what to expect from this tale of stranded warriors, who find themseleves in enemy territory: The Scottish Highlands.
"Northmen - A Viking Saga" really isn't a masterpiece, but entertaining nonetheless. For a movie produced by such relatively small studios, the film is actually pretty good looking. Strong contrasts, impressive landscapes, bad ass villain costumes and some inventive fight scenes are a lot of fun to watch and give this movie a bigger feel. The actors are all doing fine, most notably: Ed Skrein. This former "Game of Thrones" actor shows us that he can put on a game face and throw a hard punch, which is good to see since he'll take over the wheel for Jason Statham in the upcoming "The Transporter Legacy".
What this film suffers from, however, is its pretty generic plot. You'll find your typical group dynamics: the young leader, who has the responsibility to make the tough calls; a rude douche, who doubts the leaders decisions; that boyish, yet ambitious character; a loyal fighter; an older nice guy; the comic-relief-guy; an ally made along the way who might-or-might-not-be trustworthy; and of course the beautiful but feisty captured princess, who's character development needs no explanation.
Further, the writers must have taken some drug that kicks in very slowly while conceiving this script, because the movie starts off quite serious, but, especially towards the very end, gets a bit crazy when it comes to the mortality of their characters. Also, the fact that people seem to be just as fast as horses, and that the bad guy army varies in size however it is convenient to the plot, strips off this film's gravitas.
In the end, "Northmen - A Viking Saga" is an action adventure certainly meant with a wink. Definetly not a must-see, but if you ever come across it, you probably won't regret it.


For Fans Of:
Vikings (2013 - TV Series)
Solomon Kane (2009)
10.000 B.C. (2008)
Season of the Witch (2011)

Click Here To Watch Trailer!

Donnerstag, 25. September 2014

SIN CITY: A DAME TO KILL FOR - Movie Review

 Title: Sin City: A Dame to Kill For
Running Time: 102 min
Directors: Robert Rodriguez, Frank Miller
Starring: Mickey Rourke, Jessica Alba, Josh Brolin, Joseph Gordon-Levitt, Eva Green, Rosario Dawson, Bruce Willis, Ray Liota

Review:
When Robert Rodriguez pitched Frank Miller the idea to put his graphic novel into film, Miller doubted that it would work. Rodriguez however, stayed persistend and asked the comic-book writer to let him shoot a sequence that, if he still denied, would become a cool short film at the very least. This experiment ended up to be the opening sequence for one of most accurate comic book adaptations of all time. "Sin City" became an instant cult hit and even won the Technichal Grand Prize at the Cannes Film Festival 2005 for its unique visual style. After a long wait of nine years (i.a. due to some production issues) we finally get to see a second batch of Miller's stories translated into a film.
"Sin City: A Dame To Kill For" brings back the great neo-noir elements and the over the top violence from the first movie, but doesn't manage to have the same impact its predecessor had. The actors are all doing a damn good job: Newbies Brolin and Gordon-Levitt show they can fit in this universe just as well as the members of the old cast, and Eva Green gives us all she's got, which is very little when it comes to clothing, but makes her the perfect woman to give this movie its title. Jessica Alba upgrades her performance from the last movie, but it is Mickey Rourke who remains the showstealer with his perfect portrayal of the brutal and yet somehow likeable colossus Marv. With 3D in the mix, Rodriguez even managed to take the visual one step further, cleverly using the third dimension as stylistic devise in certain shots throughout the movie.
Nonetheless, the film still feels much smaller in scale than the original. The main reason for this are probably the stories: Inspite of maintaining the same great atmosphere, they just don't seem as thrilling and emotionally captivating, most likely because they are simply missing a creepy villain. While "Sin City" had a mute teenage cannibal, a yellow-skinned rapist and a half-beheaded corrupt cop, this installment settles with much more common bad guys like a mobster/senator, a money-grubbing femme fatal and a nearly indestructible henchmen. That big parts of all stories are set in the same bar, and that the main story also mostly takes place at one particular mansion, does not help to make the movie feel larger either. Lastly, the film feels much more episodic than its forerunner as the way the stories are pieced together isn't as smooth.
All in all, "Sin City: A Dame To Kill For" is a very good time and a feast for your eyes, but doesn't quite hold up to the 2005 cult classic. For all that, I am extremly curious what Rodriguez and Miller can come up with next. Although, sadly, this might rather be a question of "if", considering this movie's box office numbers...

For Fans Of:
Sin City (2005)
300: Rise of an Empire (2014)
The Spirit (2008)
The Expendables 2 (2012)

Click Here To Watch Trailer!

And check out my friend's review over at B.A.'s Screentest for a second opinion!

Mittwoch, 24. September 2014

GOTHAM - Series Premiere Review

 Title: Gotham
Premiere: 22nd September 2014
Episode Length: ca. 50 min
Creator: Bruno Heller
Starring: Ben McKenzie, Donal Logue, Jada Pinkett Smith, Robin Taylor, David Mazouz, Camren Bicondova, Cory Michael Smith, John Doman

Review:
Joel Schumacher killed the Batman franchise in 1997 with lame one-liners, goofy sets and the infamous bat-nipples. Eight years later, Christopher Nolan managed to revive the caped crusader, going back to the darker, more serious tone that made this superhero without superpowers so special. The Dark Knight might be more popular than ever before and we already know that Ben Affleck will be the next actor to put on the mask.
In the meantime, "The Mentalist" creator Bruno Heller brings us a brand new TV Series set in this masked manhunter's comic book universe, but.... without the Batman himself?!
Yes, "Gotham" might evolve around the world's greatest detective, but in this particular case that would be Jim Gordon. It is his origin story, and it starts with his biggest case yet: The murder of the Wayne Family! As we follow his path, we explore this sinister city with all its inhabitants, including but not limited to low life criminals, gang leaders, mobster, dirty cops and a few good ones as well.
The series started off very strong on Monday night. Its characters and their relationship with each other were cleverly constructed, and quite interesting and fun to watch. Among other things this is probably due to the show's perfect casting, and especially Robin Taylor shines in his role as Oswald Cobblepot. Also, when it comes to scale, this show really has the ambition to be able to compete with the movies.
This is where it has some minor problems though: the great strength of television is that it has the possibility to take its time with character development, and with a setting like Gotham I would have wished to see it go more of a neo-noir route, putting an even bigger focus on Gordon and exploring his personality even through the quiet moments when he is alone. Even more filming at night would have strengthend the atmosphere as well. This premiere felt just a little bit overcrowded and story wise they could have easily ended with a cliff-hanger about half way through. Also, the introduction of well-known Batman characters like the Riddler, or the Penguin was a little on the nose and i wish they would have trusted the audience enough to figure out who these people are by themselves.
But now I am nit-picking, because firstly, a perfect pilot is rare, and secondly, this one was already great. "Gotham" has a cool concept, seems extremely promising and shouldn't be missed by comic-book fans. If it calms down just a little bit with its story-telling, it might become a truely excellent TV experience!

For Fans Of:
Arrow (2012 - TV series)
Batman Begins (2005)
Batman: Year One (2011)
Marvel's Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. (2013 - TV series)

Click Here To Watch Trailer!

Dienstag, 23. September 2014

OUTSIDE HOLLYWOOD EP.4 - M. Night Shyamalan

 Hello there puny humans,
the fourth episode of our podcast has us talking about M. Night Shyamalan. Mentioning his heyday, exploring his downfall and extensively ranting about him hitting rock bottom with "After Earth".
Upload Music Files - Audio Hosting - Podcast #4 - After Earth
I hope you enjoy this hilariousity review!

Your Cinemartian

Montag, 15. September 2014

A MOST WANTED MAN - Movie Review

 Title: A Most Wanted Man
Running Time: 122 min
Director: Anton Corbijn
Starring: Philip Seymour Hoffman (†), Rachel McAdams, Willem Dafoe, Robin Wright, Grigory Dobrygin, Homayoun Ershadi, Daniel Brühl, Herbert Grönemeyer

Review:
After his surprising death early this year, Philip Seymour Hoffman comes, at least for a little while, back to life on the big screen. Eventhough his final postum released film will be the great conclusion of the "Hunger Games" franchise, in this one he takes on the leading role for the last time: As Günther Bachmann, he heads a team of espionage agents seeking to develop intelligence from Hamburg's local Muslim community. A post 9/11 spy story written by none other than author and former MI-6 member John le Carré.
"A Most Wanted Man" is a very interesting movie, and this is said with absolutely no sarcasm implied. It depicts espionage in a truthful light, stripped off the flashiness and explosions of the likes of Mission Impossible and James Bond. You see agents talking to contacts, listening in on conversations and having to put up with other agencies and departments that interfere with their investigations. This realism comes of course at the cost of pace, but this is ultimately also the point and kind of the charm of the film. Gathering intelligence takes its time, and you need to start at the bottom to get to the top, or as Bachmann states it: 'It takes a minnow to catch a barracuda and a barracuda to catch a shark.'
This is not a popcorn flick, and requires a bit of patience and focus, but it pays off, as the movie rewards you with great atmosphere and excellent performances. Especially the late Hoffman shows us why he will be missed. There is a lot of brilliance within the subtlety with which he portrays his characters and the impact of the final scene would not have been the same without him.
Lastly, the movie seems very up-to-date covering topics like the fear of terrorism, suspiciousness towards Muslims, and the different approaches of intelligence agencies as well as the bureaucracy they have to work with. "A Most Wanted Man" might not be a film you will rewatch very often, but one whose themes and message you will definiteley remember. So if you are in for something sophisticated, this is a film for you.


For Fans Of:
Tinker, Tailor, Soldier, Spy (2011)
The American (2010)
The Wire (2002-2008, TV Series)
Unknown (2011)

Click Here To Watch Trailer!

And check out my friend's review over at B.A.'s Screentest for a second opinion!

Mittwoch, 10. September 2014

OUTSIDE HOLLYWOOD EP.3 - Summer Blockbusters

 Hello there puny humans,
it's been some time since our last podcast, but now we are back: This time Björn Hoppe and I are reviewing the Summer Blockbuster Season and its greatest movies!



Listen and enjoy!
Your Cinemartian

Donnerstag, 4. September 2014

BEGIN AGAIN - Movie Review

 Title: Begin Again
Running Time: 104 min
Director: John Carney
Starring: Keira Knightley, Mark Ruffalo, Adam Levine, Hailee Steinfeld, Catherine Keener, James Corden, Mos Def, Cee-Lo Green

Review:
After the independent film "Once", which he filmed with his former 'The Frames' band colleague Glenn Hansard, and which won an Acadamy Award as well as a Grammy for its songs, irish director John Carney makes his mainstream debut. Sticking with the topic of music, he is now joined by Keira Knightley and Mark Ruffalo, as well as Maroon 5 frontman Adam Levine with his first acting gig.
"Begin Again" starts off introducing our first protagonist Dan Mulligan and tries a bit too hard to show us that this obvious loser is obviously a loser, giving us every cliché including laziness, unpunctuality, alcoholism, being broke, being divorced, being unemployed and forgetting an important detail about his daughter so you see what a bad dad he is. However, Mark Rufallo is such a charismatic guy, that you kind of roll with it and have your fun. Then we get to know Keira Knightley's Gretta and her life with a boyfriend turned famous. This relationship eventually ends, but with less drama than you would expect.
In general, the movie is missing that big climacting break down, where everything goes wrong and which the characters have to recover from. But this is what is somehow charming about the movie. Except for the beginning mentioned above, the plot development feels very real, with some ups and downs, but no typical hollywood disaster. Among other things this might be due to the fact that a lot of scenes were improvised, which is pretty rare for movies outside of the comedy genre.
The songs, obviously playing a big part in this film, are mostly played in full length, but are embedded nicely into the film's story in different ways. They are very good listening and Keira Knightley's soft voice worked surprisingly well with them. So while not being the most thrilling thing in theaters right now, it is nice litte film to watch. A feel good movie about the love for and through music, with some cute ways to portray it.  

For Fans Of:
Once (2006)

Click Here To Watch Trailer! 

Montag, 1. September 2014

GUARDIANS OF THE GALAXY 3D - Movie Review

 Title: Guardians of the Galaxy
Running Time: 121 min 
Director: James Gunn
Starring: Chris Pratt, Zoe Saldana, Dave Bautista, Bradley Cooper, Vin Diesel, Lee Pace, Karen Gillan, Benicio Del Torro, John C. Reilly, Glenn Close, Michael Rooker

Review:
Even without the rights to their biggies Spider-Man and the X-Men, Marvel Studios has managed to build maybe the biggest and most successfull movie universe of all time. So good, that while DC is still struggling to deliver outside of Nolan's Batman Trilogy, Marvel tried their luck with D-List comic heroes including a talking racoon and a tree version of hodor. What sounded like a gamble on paper seemed to have everyone hooked on a feeling after the first trailer and people got really excited about "Guardians of the Galaxy". And they had every right to do so!
If science fiction was music, then this film would be rock'n'roll! Witty, bold, insubordinate and just extremely cool: "Guardians of the Galaxy" takes you on a ride. This is a movie, that can almost get away with anything, just because it is so self-aware and doesn't take itself too serious. Yes, the writers have done an exceptional job. Instead of giving us each character's origin (with the exception of Peter Quill, but even his back story feels more like a prologue), they rather let the viewer learn about their past very smoothly through certain dialogues or scenes. With all its great one-liners, this film could as well be called a comedy and even the mandatory cheesy emotional moments of such a superhero story are quickly followed by a brilliant joke to losen up the atmosphere again. All this mixed with some kick-ass sci-fi space action and cleverly choreographed fight-scenes makes for some damn good entertainment.
But every great script relies on the delivery by the cast. The leading man in this case is Chris Pratt, who plays the charismatic self-proclaimed "Star-Lord" and gives us the perfect mix of Han Solo and Indiana Jones, with a hint of Andy Dwyer*. Next to him is Zoe Saldana as Gamora, being bad-ass as usual, eventhough she could have gotten more time to shine. Dave Bautista does his best portraying Drax the Destroyer, which might not be that much, but the way the script is written helps him out and in the end he really is a sympathetic guy. But the real showstealers here are Rocket and Groot. Especially the former of the duo provides most of the laughs and paired with that twee tree, he has the most hilarious moments of the film.
Lastly, this movie's look and style are a treat as well. The visuals effects are awesome and the use of prostetics and make-up instead of CGI can truly be appreciated. Also, the soundtrack is simply a must-buy. Almost Tarantino-worthy!
Having all that going on for it, "Guardians of the Galaxy" will make you overlook the forgettable villain or other minor flaws, mostly because you will be too busy quoting lines from it on the ride home from the theater.

 For Fans Of:
The Avengers (2012)
Serenity (2005)
The Losers (2010) 
Star Wars: Episode V - The Empire Strikes Back (1980)
John Carter (2012)
Star Trek (2009)
Footloose (1984)

Click Here To Watch Trailer! 

*Andy Dwyer is Chris Pratt's character on the show "Parks and Recreation"

Montag, 25. August 2014

WHEN ANIMALS DREAM - Movie Review

 Title: When Animals Dream (orig.: Når dyrene drømmer)
Running Time: 84 min
Director: Jonas Alexander Arnby 
Starring: Sonja Oftebro, Lars Mikkelsen, Jakob Oftebro

Review:
After great comedies like "Adam's Apples" or "The Green Butcher", and gritty thrillers like "Headhunters" or the "Millennium Trilogy", one really shouldn't underestimate Skandinavian film making. So when the name of a Danish production company popped up at the beginning of last weeks sneak preview, I didn't mind at all, and curiously watched as the plot of  "When Animals Dream" unfolded.
It evolves around 16-year old Marie, who lives on a small island with her father and mother, the latter of which appears to be seriously ill. Thus, she has to take care of her, without being fully grown up herself, but that's not all. Something mysterious is going on with her, and she discovers the darker sides of her personality.
What might as well be the premiss of another bromidic adaptation of a young adult novel, is really more of a drama with a fantasy/horror element. It is a movie thats certainly not for everyone. With its very slow narrative tempo and more silent moments than actual dialogue, it takes some patience and will probably bore you if you're not into that kind of stuff. If however you are looking for different type of film, with the typical dreary northern atmosphere, then this movie might be worth your attention. It's an interesting take on the topic (which i try not to spoil here) and if you want to stay surprised, I do not recommend watching the trailer as it firstly gives away a lot and secondly is missleading in terms of the amount of action presented in this movie.
So all in all, this isn't a film you will invite your friends over for, but rather something to check out out of personal interest. 

For Fans Of: 
Black Swan (2010)
Let Me In (2010)
Penny Dreadful (2014 - TV Series)

And check out my friend's review over at B.A.'s Screentest for a second opinion! (Spoiler Alert)

Donnerstag, 21. August 2014

LUCY - Movie Review

 Title: Lucy
Running Time: 89 min
Director: Luc Besson
Starring: Scarlett Johansson, Morgan Freeman, Min-sik Choi, Amr Waked

Review:
The theory that humans use only ten percent of their brain capacity has already been proven false back in the 1980's, and yet, in 2011, Neil Burger's "Limitless" managed to build a highly intoxicating thriller around this exact same myth. Now, three years later, french director Luc Besson tries his luck with a similar premise, but a much more science-fictitious approach. So does his version of the false fact work just as well? Unfortunately, not quite so.
There is a lot of greatness in "Lucy", especially at the beginning. The stylistic choices in the opening scene are extremely clever, and beautiful modern film making. The film in general is very good-looking and has a lot of powerfull imagery and symbolism going on. Despite all this potential however, the film fails to captivate the viewer.
All the science presented is of course totally non-sense, but the actual problem in this movie is probably its lack conflict and characters to identify with. About twenty minutes into the movie, our main character is already kind of indestructible, and so every action sequence (while still looking really cool) loses its thrill as at no point we feel anything to be a real threat to our protagonist. Her humanity disappears without any sign of inner struggle, and since she gained her abilities through something that was essentially designed as a street drug, she doesn't even seem to be special or "chosen". That the other characters in the movie also seem oddly okay with someone basically turning into... well... God, and their lack of character development do not help either. And finally, the flash drive ending is just completely bonkers.
Overall, with some adjustments here and there, Lucy could have been a great sci-fi action thriller, but instead falls flat after a good start. Watchable, and somewhat entertaining, but not for movie theater prices. Catch this one on free TV or maybe as a rental.


For Fans Of:
Limitless (2011)
Transcendence (2014)
Matrix Revolutions (2003)

Click Here To Watch Trailer!

Samstag, 16. August 2014

DAWN OF THE PLANET OF THE APES - Movie Review

 Title: Dawn of the Planet of the Apes
Running Time: 130 min
Director: Matt Reeves
Starring: Andy Serkis, Toby Kebbel, Jason Clarke, Gary Oldman, Keri Kussel

Review:
When Producer Arthur P. Jacobs bought the rights to Pierre Boulle's novel "La Planète des Singes" in 1963, he probably didn't expect that he'd start a franchise that would last 50 years and counting. The original film adaptation with Charlton Heston was a huge success and turned into a classic. Now, four sequels, one television series, an aweful reboot, and a critically acclaimed "re-reboot"/prequel later, we get the latest installment of this incredible saga*. Following  the events of "Rise" the movie takes us a step further to how the Planet of the Apes actually came to be. And it does so in an amazing way.
"Dawn of the Planet of the Apes" keeps you invested from the very first scene until the end credits roll. It is a true blockbuster, that is very well paced and full of action, heart and a lot of social commentary. The latter is actually impossible to miss, as the whole story evolves around two groups (in this case species) that are at the brink of war, mostly because of missunderstandings, preconceptions and radical individuals within their own ranks. This believable depiction of conflict might make the story predictable at some points, but only because real conflicts really do seem to follow similar patterns.
And then there's of course the elephant gorilla in the room: The visual effects! If you are not in it for content, there is no need to worry for this movie is truely a feast for the eyes! With the most advanced technique of performance capture Weta Workshop has done a groundbreaking job with the visuals. Seeing how they trasformed the actors into such realistic apes simply leaves you in awe and is an enchanting experience. If this movie does not get the Oscar Gold for its VFX, i doubt there is a sane person left in the Academy.
However, this method is called performance capture for a reason and in no way should the computer animation overshadow the fantastic job these actors have done. Andy Serkis, the god of playing animated characters, outperforms himself once again and elevates all his co-stars on to his level. Not only do they get the strong emotions across, but they physically play apes at the same time. Posture, movement and facial expressions are so spot on, that at no point in the movie you have the feeling you are watching film actors pretending to be apes, but rather apes acting in a film.
Further it needs to be mentioned that, unlike in Avatar for example, 90% of the scenes were shot on location, which meant an even greater challenge for the actors and  the VFX-Team. But before I run out of positive adjectives, I urge you to check out all the behind the scenes footage you can get your hands on and much more importantly to watch this film in theaters!

*so basically the sequel of the prequel of the planet of the apes, which is basically a reboot.

For Fans Of:
Rise of the Planet of the Apes (2011)
Battle for the Planet of the Apes (1973)
Planet of the Apes (1968)
Malcom X (1992)

Click Here To Watch Trailer!

And check out my friend's review over at B.A.'s Screentest for a second opinion!

Dienstag, 12. August 2014

In Memory Of Robin Williams

 Hello there fellow film lovers,
it has been quite some time since my last entry, and yet, I wish I didn't have a reason to post something today. However, as you might have heard by now, yesterday on August 11, 2014, the great Robin Williams died at age 63.

This news really took me by surprise and never has the passing of a celebrity affected me as much as this one. Probably because this was the person whose films I grew up with. More than a familiar face on TV. The man who could always make me laugh.
As a little kid, I watched "Jumanji" over and over again till it annoyed the heck out of my relatives and to this day it is the film I've seen the most. It was pure movie magic the first time and every other time I popped in that VHS and pressed the play button. "Mr. Doubtfire", "Jack" and especially "Hook" are more examples of how Robin Williams not only entertained me as a child, but spawned my imagination and gave me role models to look up to.
As I got older I had the pleasure of enjoying his more serious works, and saw that his warmth and kindness translated to drama as good as they did to comedy. With his outstanding performance in "Good Will Hunting" he gave us what a professor of mine called 'the best portrayal of a psychologist in film ever', which earned him the Academy Award for Best Supporting Actor. Also, his perfect delivery in "Dead Poets Society" (as seen below) gives you even more chills now that he's passed away. And finally as if we needed more proof of his talent, he even managed to creep us out by playing against his usual type in films such as "Insomnia" and "One Hour Photo".
I could talk all day about so many brilliant pieces in his filmography, but what is really worth mentioning is that (looking at his co-stars and friends) his affectionate and warm-hearted on-screen-persona must have been just the same when the cameras turned off. The world lost a great artist, but more importantly, it lost a great human being!

Carpe Diem,
Your Cinemartian



"I could not be more stunned by the loss of Robin Williams, mensch, great talent, acting partner, genuine soul." 
- Steve Martin

"Robin was a lightning storm of comic genius and our laughter was the thunder that sustained him. He was a pal and I can't believe he's gone."
- Steven Spielberg

"I've never known a sweeter, brighter, more considerate person than Robin. Robin's commitment as an artist to lifting our mood and making us happy is compared to none. He loved us all and we loved him back."
- John Travolta

 "His kindness and generosity is what I think of. How kind he was to anyone who wanted to connect with him. And he could not help but be funny all the time. He would do something as long as it would keep you laughing. He made many, many film crews laugh out loud before the audiences ever saw it. He made such a big impact on the world." 
- Ben Stiller

"Robin Williams was an airman, a doctor, a genie, a nanny, a president, a professor, a bangarang Peter Pan, and everything in between. But he was one of a kind. He arrived in our lives as an alien – but he ended up touching every element of the human spirit. He made us laugh. He made us cry. He gave his immeasurable talent freely and generously to those who needed it most – from our troops stationed abroad to the marginalized on our own streets. The Obama family offers our condolences to Robin’s family, his friends, and everyone who found their voice and their verse thanks to Robin Williams." 
- Barack Obama

"I lost my husband and my best friend, while the world lost one of its most beloved artists and beautiful human beings. I am utterly heartbroken." 
- Susan Schneider